But it's not just that I'm not pretending they are analog. They are proudly digital. If you want analog sounds, use analog gear! There are many, many things that analog does better than digital, and I am strongly of the opinion that using digital to model them is like painting portraits with a decorating roller. It's possible, and may have limited useful applications, but it is almost always inferior to using a more appropriate tool.
What I'm about is building digital instruments, with the sound engines that digital does best, behind interfaces that recall the classic synths of the 60s and 70s. The interface matters. Bizarrely, those early interfaces are more easily taken to their natural conclusion in digital than in their original voltage-controlled glory. There simply wasn't room for 2,000-plus matrix pins on a VCS3! In addition, you couldn't save and reuse a set of joystick-derived x/y coordinates in 1969. It's trivially easy in 2026.
I have three synths: an FM one, a Karplus-Strong one and a wavetable one. These were the first places that digital really shone.
Mellt, Tant and Tonnau are thought experiments baked into life with engineering.
And I've pushed the opportunity that gives me.